EMILY's List

$78,403,309 raised for candidates since 1985. 354,910 members strong and growing.
Contribute
Two words for Congressman Stupak: Thank you

Two words for Congressman Stupak: Thank you

By Stephanie Schriock on 03/08/2010 @ 11:54 AM

Tags: Women's Rights, Stop Stupak, Health Care, Stephanie's Take

I have two words for Cong. Bart Stupak today, and I promise they're not sarcastic: Thank you!

Permalink | Comments ()

A sorry tale

A sorry tale

By Ellen R. Malcolm on 12/19/2009 @ 07:55 PM

Tags: Health Care, Women's Rights, US House, US Senate, Stupak-Pitts Amendment, Stop Stupak

If there ever was a case study for why we need more pro-choice Democratic women in Congress, it is the fiasco around abortion coverage in health care reform.

Permalink | Comments ()

Mikulski decries Nelson amendment as

Mikulski decries Nelson amendment as "insulting, humiliating"

By Emily on 12/08/2009 @ 12:45 PM

Tags: Stop Stupak, Stupak-Pitts Amendment, Women's Rights, US Senate, Barbara Mikulski

We've heard from plenty of women who are fired up about the Stupak and Nelson amendments in the House and Senate that would deny millions of women access to safe, affordable reproductive care.

Permalink | Comments ()

UPDATE: Nelson amendment update: Women senators speak out

UPDATE: Nelson amendment update: Women senators speak out

By Emily on 12/07/2009 @ 06:23 PM

Tags: Stop Stupak, Stupak-Pitts Amendment, Women's Rights, US Senate, Barbara Boxer, Claire McCaskill, Debbie Stabenow

We'd heard about Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson's plan to propose an amendment "as identical to Stupak as it can be," and today Nelson did just that.

Permalink | Comments ()

The heart of the health care debate on abortion

The heart of the health care debate on abortion

By Ellen R. Malcolm on 12/07/2009 @ 10:27 AM

Tags: Stop Stupak, Stupak-Pitts Amendment, Health Care, Reproductive Rights, Women's Rights

Politics is dangerously personal for women right now.

Permalink | Comments ()

Attack On Abortion Rights Continues in Senate

Attack On Abortion Rights Continues in Senate

By Emily on 12/01/2009 @ 06:24 PM

Tags: Women's Rights, Health care, US Senate, Reproductive Rights, Stupak-Pitts Amendment, Stop Stupak

The fight is far from over.

Permalink | Comments ()

EMILY's List women take on Stupak/Pitts Amendment

EMILY's List women take on Stupak/Pitts Amendment

By Emily on 11/23/2009 @ 03:43 PM

Tags: Stupak-Pitts Amendment, Diana DeGette, Women's Rights, Health Care, Stop Stupak

We've long known that EMILY's List elected women are the firewall against restrictions on women's reproductive rights.

Permalink | Comments ()

DeGette takes lead in battle against Stupak/Pitts Amendment

DeGette takes lead in battle against Stupak/Pitts Amendment

By Emily on 11/20/2009 @ 03:43 PM

Tags: Diana DeGette, Women's Rights, Health Care, Stupak-Pitts Amendment, Stop Stupak

Diana, who co-chairs the House's pro-choice caucus with another EMILY's List alum, Cong. Louise Slaughter (NY-28), took a lead role in speaking out against the amendment after it was introduced, and she has been actively working to educate voters about the amendment's potential outcomes and make sure it's not included in the final version of the bill.

Permalink | Comments ()

Amy Walters on Mad Men and political women

Amy Walters on Mad Men and political women

By Emily on 11/18/2009 @ 05:00 PM

Tags: Women's Rights, Stupak-Pitts Amendment, Stop Stupak

Trust me -- you don't to miss Amy Walters' National Journal piece from yesterday.

Permalink | Comments ()

Gillibrand takes a stand against Stupak/Pitts Amendment

Gillibrand takes a stand against Stupak/Pitts Amendment

By Emily on 11/17/2009 @ 07:51 PM

Tags: Kirsten Gillibrand, Women's Rights, US Senate, Stupak-Pitts Amendment, Stop Stupak

Since joining the Senate in January, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (NY) hasn't hesitated to take on tough issues.

Permalink | Comments ()

Why it matters

Why it matters

By Emily on 11/08/2009 @ 05:16 PM

Tags: Health care, US House, Women's rights, Stupak-Pitts Amendment, Stop Stupak

I thought having a pro-choice Congress and a pro-choice president would mean that women's reproductive rights would be protected.

Permalink | Comments ()

Assault on women's reproductive rights continues with a vengeance

Assault on women's reproductive rights continues with a vengeance

By Ellen R. Malcolm on 11/07/2009 @ 06:06 PM

Tags: Health care, US House, Women's rights, Stupak-Pitts Amendment, Stop Stupak

As Congress struggled to pass health care reform to improve the lives of America's families, anti-choice forces took advantage of the situation to mount yet another assault on abortion.

Permalink | Comments ()

Comments

Leave a Comment

?
You Type You See
*italics* italics
**bold** bold
[ask google](http://google.com) ask google
+ item 1
+ item 2
+ item 3
  • item 1
  • item 2
  • item 3
> a really cool quote from a nice person
a really cool quote from a nice person

* Required information

Comment Preview

© 2012 All rights reserved. EMILY's List, Early Money Is Like Yeast, and the EMILY's List logo are all trademarks of EMILY's List.

1120 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20036 | Main Phone Number: (202) 326-1400


Contributions or gifts to EMILY's List or endorsed candidates are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes.

Contributions are subject to the limitations and prohibitions of the Federal Election Campaign Act.